<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GuysNation &#187; Millenium Trilogy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.guysnation.com/tag/millenium-trilogy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.guysnation.com</link>
	<description>We talk about Guy Stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Drive For 66 in 2011: Watched-In-December Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.guysnation.com/drive-66-2011-watched-in-december-reviews</link>
		<comments>http://www.guysnation.com/drive-66-2011-watched-in-december-reviews#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Fincher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drive for 66]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Lantern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice League]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Millenium Trilogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noomi Rapace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooney Mara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Gosling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Reynolds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Carrel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will Ferrell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guysnation.com/?p=12535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the beginning of the year, I knew I wasn’t going to be able to see as many movies in 2011 as I would like, so when I was considering my yearly quest to see as many movies as possible which I hadn’t seen before, I set my goal low for the Drive for 66. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the beginning of the year, I knew I wasn’t going to be able to see as many movies in 2011 as I would like, so when I was considering my yearly quest to see as many movies as possible which I hadn’t seen before, I set my goal low for the <a href="../www.guysnation.com/tag/drive-for-66" target="_blank">Drive for 66</a>.</p>
<p>I blew that away before August was over.</p>
<p>So I set a new goal of 85 movies, which was at least 11 films too low based on my rate of seeing movies, but I did it anyway, and I had passed that before November started. I didn’t set a new goal, but it would be cool to surpass the number I set last year, which was 95.</p>
<p>Here are my reviews and superlative-candidates for the films I saw in December:</p>
<p>95. <strong>Everything Must Go</strong></p>
<p>Will Ferrell movies are usually hit-or-miss for me, as I don&#8217;t always enjoy some of his absurdist humor much the same way I feel about Jim Carrey. As with Carrey, I like to see what Ferrell can do in movies which are a lot heavier on the drama and lighter on the comedy, which is what drove me to see Everything Must Go. Ferrell does a great job in this film of depicting a relapsed alcoholic dealing with his wife leaving him and looking forward. I didn&#8217;t like all the plot choices, as I really felt like they were going the extra mile to make us dislike some of the side characters, some of whom we never end up meeting. This is definitely not a &#8220;don&#8217;t miss&#8221; film, but if you want to see Ferrell display his acting talents on the opposite end of the spectrum from what you&#8217;ve seen in films like Step Brothers and Anchorman, give it a watch. It probably won&#8217;t be the highlight of your movie-watching-month, but I&#8217;m guessing you won&#8217;t feel like you wasted an evening. If you absolutely hate EVERYTHING MUST GO and you wish you had just watched one of the aforementioned absurdist Ferrell flicks, let me know and I&#8217;ll add you to the list of people with whom I&#8217;ll never watch a movie.</p>
<p>96. <strong>Super</strong></p>
<p>The concept for SUPER really appealed to me, with Rainn Wilson portraying a guy who&#8217;s looking to fight crime as a masked vigilante similar to last year&#8217;s KICK-ASS. I hadn&#8217;t heard great things about the film so I went in with lowered expectations, and that was fortunate, because this wasn&#8217;t a great movie. I&#8217;m not sure if I would call it an enjoyable movie, but I would watch it again. The film is very violent. At times it&#8217;s one of the most graphically violent films I&#8217;ve seen in the past two years, including a moment when Wilson splits open someone&#8217;s head with a pipe-wrench and considerable detail is depicted. The film also includes a number of absurd moments where the concept itself was potentially groan-worthy, and the way the scene was presented made it worse. For those of you who have seen the movie or will see the movie, I&#8217;m specifically referencing the scene where the idea for Wilson to fight crime is &#8220;implanted&#8221; in his brain.</p>
<p>97. <strong>Crazy, Stupid, Love.</strong></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a movie that seems like it would be a chick flick which guys will probably enjoy. Steve Carrel isn&#8217;t in a comedic role here, but he does a great job as the sympathetic-but-not-sad-sack male lead. Ryan Gosling plays a guy&#8217;s guy who&#8217;s one of my favorite characters of the year. Emma Stone is around for some eye candy, for those of you who find her attractive.  All-in-all this isn&#8217;t going to be one of the best movies I&#8217;ve seen in 2011, but it was one of the more enjoyable ones. I&#8217;m guessing that it won&#8217;t be in my Top 100 when I go about finding a place for it on my all-time list, but I wouldn&#8217;t be totally shocked if it is. For guys who have kids, I&#8217;d recommend checking it out. Guys under the age of 19 might not enjoy it, but everyone else will probably enjoy it, and it&#8217;s definitely a movie you can watch with a female significant other.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guysnation.com/wp-content/uploads//2012/01/rooney-mara-the-girl-with-the-dragon-tattoo.jpeg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-12537" title="rooney-mara-the-girl-with-the-dragon-tattoo" src="http://www.guysnation.com/wp-content/uploads//2012/01/rooney-mara-the-girl-with-the-dragon-tattoo-300x195.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="195" /></a>98. <strong>Girl With The Dragon Tattoo</strong></p>
<p>Disclaimer: I can&#8217;t stress enough that this is not in the same teenager-targeting realm as Twilight or Harry Potter, and anyone who expects it to be like that would be shocked by the intensity of this film and the mature nature of its themes. I love David Fincher movies, I loved this book series and I&#8217;d recommend this film (and the books) to anyone who doesn&#8217;t shy away from intense themes. It&#8217;s not a comfortable movie, but it&#8217;s extremely well crafted and executed. Anyone who clamors on about how the American version of this film was unnecessary due to the Swedish Noomi Rapace version fails to acknowledge that mainstream audiences won&#8217;t appreciate the complex plot if they have to follow along with the subtitles. I watched the Swedish version after having read the books and I still had trouble figuring out the different characters. Also, no offense to Ms Rapace, but she&#8217;s nowhere near as nice to look at as Rooney Mara. My suggestion: watch the David Fincher American version of the film after reading the book, and then if you get some time, check out the Swedish version (currently available on Netflix Instant).</p>
<p>99. <strong>Green Lantern</strong></p>
<p>I aw so many superhero movies in 2011 that I felt like I should check out Ryan Reynolds attempt at joining the Justice League, no matter how maligned it was. Some of the CGI used in this film was decent, namely the devices created by the rings of the Green Lantern Corps. Some of the other CGI, however, was just poorly done. This includes a lot of the scenery when some of the characters are flying through Oa, the Green Lantern planet, and the CGI costume &#8220;worn&#8221; by Reynolds. Some of the acting was also a problem, which seems to be the case any time Tim Robbins plays an eccentric character like he did in City Of Ember. Ryan Reynolds was a great choice for the superhero lead role, and I don&#8217;t have any of the same issues that critics previously expressed with the chemistry between Reynolds and Blake Lively. If you saw Thor or Captain America and even partially enjoyed them, you may as well check out Green Lantern.</p>
<p>100. <strong>Nightmare Before Christmas</strong></p>
<p>A few times in the past decade I&#8217;ve considered watching this cult favorite, but the rest of those times happened to fall during the wrong part of the year. As this movie mixes part Halloween and part Christmas, it didn&#8217;t make sense to watch it in April or July, and now that the timing worked out for when it came to mind, I finally watched it. The concept was interesting, but I didn&#8217;t care much for the execution. I don&#8217;t feel strongly either way about claymation, but I don&#8217;t typically enjoy musicals, which this essentially was.  Some people enjoy this film enough to make it part of their yearly traditions for either (or both) of the holidays involved, but this will probably be the last time I sit down with the intention of watching this film. Maybe someday I&#8217;ll watch it with my son, but it&#8217;s not on my long-term to-do list.</p>
<h1>Potential Nominees</h1>
<p>Best Picture &#8211; Girl With The Dragon Tattoo</p>
<p>Best Actress &#8211; Rooney Mara (Girl With The Dragon Tattoo)</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor &#8211; Ryan Gosling (Crazy, Stupid, Love.)</p>
<p><strong>Awards and Year-End/Quest-End Wrap-Up in separate article</strong></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guysnation.com%2Fdrive-66-2011-watched-in-december-reviews&amp;title=Drive%20For%2066%20in%202011%3A%20Watched-In-December%20Reviews" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.guysnation.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guysnation.com/drive-66-2011-watched-in-december-reviews/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drive for 66: Month 7 &amp; 8 (July &amp; August 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.guysnation.com/drive-66-month-7-july-2011</link>
		<comments>http://www.guysnation.com/drive-66-month-7-july-2011#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Garfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Faris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashton Kutcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brad Pitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Captain America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carey Mulligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Evans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christoph Waltz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drive for 66]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hayley Atwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inglorious Basterds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keira Knightley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Damon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melanie Laurent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Millenium Trilogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Downey Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saoirse Ronan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saoirse Ronan Eric Bana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teresa Palmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fighter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy Lee Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topher Grace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWE Films]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guysnation.com/?p=9006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2011, my goal is to see 66 movies I had never seen before the year began.  The start was optimism-inspiring for the potential to surpass the goal.  In January and February I saw a combined 11 films, putting me right on track.  I hit 18 movies by the end of March, putting me on [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guysnation.com/wp-content/uploads//2011/03/Drive-For-66.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-5929" title="Drive-For-66" src="http://www.guysnation.com/wp-content/uploads//2011/03/Drive-For-66-300x298.png" alt="" width="300" height="298" /></a>In 2011, my goal is to see 66 movies I had never seen before the year began.  The start was optimism-inspiring for the potential to surpass the goal.  In <strong><a href="../drive-for-66-months-1-and-2" target="_blank">January and February</a></strong> I saw a combined 11 films, putting me right on track.  I hit 18 movies <a href="../drive-for-66-month-3" target="_blank">by the end of March</a>, putting me on average of 6 movies per month. When the close of April hit, I had seen 29 movies, which put me on pace to hit 87 movies this year. My viewing rate had me on pace for 96 movies  by the time May was over, and I said that when June was done, I&#8217;d reconsider my goal.</p>
<p>July is done, so is August, and although I&#8217;m on pace to break 100 movies this year, that&#8217;s too ambitious for me. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;d surpass that tally if I set it as my goal, but I&#8217;d rather enjoy the films I watch instead of pushing myself to see movies for the sake of adding them to the list. I&#8217;ll increase my goal to 85 (though the name of these articles won&#8217;t change).</p>
<p>Below is a list of the films I’ve seen in the months of July and August and my corresponding review of each film.  Following those reviews is a list of potential superlative nominations from those films for various categories along the lines of what you might see in the Academy Awards and such. With no further ado, here are the reviews for the films which I had never seen prior to the start of 2011.</p>
<h1>September</h1>
<p>54. <strong>The Fighter</strong></p>
<p>There&#8217;s no doubt in my mind that this movie was worthy of being a Best Picture nominee. While I don&#8217;t totally understand how/why an Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress was awarded to Melissa Leo for the portrayal of the mother, but there&#8217;s no doubt that Christian Bale&#8217;s portrayal of Dick Eklund was one of the best I&#8217;ve ever seen. Great film, and I was very happy to have watched it with my dad, a boxing fan who doesn&#8217;t always like to spend his afternoons watching movies, but he liked the movie as much as I did.</p>
<p>55. <strong>Surrogates</strong></p>
<p>This movie has a very interesting concept at its core, and although GAMER also builds its plot around the concept, SURROGATES executes considerably better. It was a better script with much better acting. On its own merits, it&#8217;s not a great movie, but it&#8217;s more entertaining than I was lead to believe by the people I asked about it. If you&#8217;re looking for a great film, skip this and go elsewhere, but if you enjoy watching movies with interesting and unique concepts, you could do worse.</p>
<p><strong>56. That&#8217;s What I Am</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m never sure what to expect from WWE Films, but I know that Ed Harris is a great actor so I was fairly sure I was going to enjoy this movie, and I did. Aside from a couple short scenes, Randy Orton was barely involved in the movie, so I almost don&#8217;t consider this a WWE Film. A special shout-out to Alexander Walters, who did a great job of portraying the character of &#8220;Big G&#8221;, and although he won&#8217;t win, he&#8217;s definitely nominated for Best Supporting Actor, especially in his first movie role. Though I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily nominate the film for any awards, there were some strong performances in it and the storytelling did a great job to emotionally connect us with a couple of the characters. If coming-of-age tales interest you, give this one a look.</p>
<p>57. <strong>Spread</strong></p>
<p>I can&#8217;t remember when and where I saw an interview with Ashton Kutcher about this movie, but I almost wish I didn&#8217;t. The movie sounded mildly interesting from the way Kutcher talked about it, but it turns out that he did a much better job  of hyping it up than it deserved. I&#8217;m just glad that I found it on Netflix Instant instead of wasting a rental on it, because if that DVD had been delivered to my mailbox, I would&#8217;ve thrown it right back into the mail box about 48 seconds after the movie was over. SKIP IT.</p>
<p>58. <strong>The Soloist</strong></p>
<p>Great movie. I don&#8217; think it&#8217;ll end up in my top 50&#8230; maybe my top 75&#8230; but it&#8217;s definitely a must-watch for people who like movies. If you primarily watch &#8220;feel good&#8221; movies, find some time to view one that isn&#8217;t. Make it a double feature and watch something light-hearted after The Soloist, but I&#8217;m betting that with the strong performances by Robert Downey Jr and the amazing work from Jamie Foxx, you&#8217;ll enjoy this one more.</p>
<p>59. <strong>The Adjustment Bureau</strong></p>
<p>About a decade ago I saw a great film called DARK CITY, and when I saw previews for THE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, it was like deja-vu&#8230; without the film-noire. The Adjustment Bureau was far more mainstream, a lot less weird, but I wouldn&#8217;t say it was more enjoyable&#8230; for me, anyway. For most people, however, The Adjustment Bureau is the far more acceptable option, and I don&#8217;t have any problem with that because it&#8217;s a decent movie. Not great, but decent.</p>
<p>60. <strong>The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo</strong> (<em>Swedish</em>)</p>
<p>After finishing the first book in the Millenium trilogy, I was interested in checking out the corresponding movie.  I don&#8217;t have any problems with subtitled movies, so that&#8217;s not the problem I had with this film. Maybe it was the pacing or the fact that some of the performances lacked a bit of depth, or that they left out some parts o the book which I&#8217;d deem to have a decent level of importance in the Millenium trilogy. For people who didn&#8217;t read the book, I&#8217;d think the movie could be enjoyable, but I was less than thrilled with it and I&#8217;m highly anticipating the one coming up later this year with Daniel Craig. For anyone who claims that Hollywood&#8217;s upcoming remake / adaptation is unnecessary, they have NO CLUE that the majority of American audiences would have such a lackluster response to this film that they&#8217;d likely not move on to The Girl Who Played With Fire, let alone The Girl Who Kicked The Hornet&#8217;s Nest.</p>
<p>61. ** <strong>Captain America: The First Avenger</strong></p>
<p>See those stars? It means I saw it in the theater, and I was really glad I did. I&#8217;ve seen very few films in the theater this year, and although this wasn&#8217;t a great movie, it was a really good popcorn action flick with special effects and action sequences that deserve to be seen on a very big screen. I initially didn&#8217;t like the idea of Chris Evans being cast as Captain America for several reasons. In Fantastic Four, he portrayed a cocky Johnny Storm sooo well that I thought he was mis-cast as the very serious, dutiful, leader-of-men hero that Cap&#8217; should be. He showed considerable dramatic range in this role, which makes me satisfied in their choice. The other reason was that now he portrays two characters in the Marvel Universe, though if (and when) they reboot Fantastic Four, they&#8217;ll be looking for a new Johnny Storm anyway, so I guess that shouldn&#8217;t bother me anymore&#8230; despite the fact that I actually liked the first film AND Rise Of The Silver Surfer. Back to THE FIRST AVENGER, Tommy Lee Jones did a great job in his role, Hayley Atwell was bewitching as Peggy Carter, and Sebastian Stan portrayed Bucky well enough that I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see a spin-off with him in it. Hugo Weaving, as you might expect, was an excellent villain, and Dominic Cooper not only captured the Howard Stark character, but his subtle nuances lead you to believe that he could be the younger version of a character seen in stock footage during IRON MAN 2 of the older Howard, portrayed by John Slattery.</p>
<p>62. <strong>Revolutionary Road</strong></p>
<p>As a side quest on the Drive For 66 (which is going to be something around 100), I&#8217;m trying to see as many of the Academy Award / Golden Globe Best Picture nominees from the past three years, which is how this movie ended up on my list. I had high expectations going into the film, given the nominations and the fact that Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet have good chemistry with one another. There&#8217;s no doubting the quality of Revolutionary Road, but I&#8217;ll NEVER watch it again, and I almost regret watching it. It was one of the most depressing movies I&#8217;ve ever seen, bar none. If you don&#8217;t mind movies with overly depressing tones, you&#8217;re likely to enjoy this film, but I didn&#8217;t. At all.</p>
<p><strong>63. Pearl Harbor</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure why I avoided this film for 10 years, but I did. I think it had something to do with the fact that it was three hours long, and at some point I soured on both Ben Affleck (probably because of Daredevil) and Josh Hartnett (Hollywood Homicide, probably). With them basically being the co-lead males in the film, I lost a lot of interest despite Kate Beckinsale being the love interest for both. Once I finally saw it, I was impressed with the epic nature of the film. Though it was an entertaining flick, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll ever watch it again. I would recommend it to anyone who hasn&#8217;t seen it, though.</p>
<h1>August</h1>
<p><strong>64. Mister Eleven</strong></p>
<p>Ah, Netflix Instant, the interesting options you present to me. Though this film is listed on IMDB as being a two-episode mini-series, it wasn&#8217;t split in two on Netflix Instant and I didn&#8217;t notice a spot where it would&#8217;ve been. This wasn&#8217;t a great film, but it did an alright job at entertaining me for a bit. It&#8217;s not a typical romantic comedy by any means, and certain parts of it actually lends itself more to being a drama, but it&#8217;s certainly quirky in nature and a light-hearted look at a few people who are terrible at relationships. If you&#8217;re bored and can&#8217;t find anything else to watch on TV or on Netflix Instant, this is a decent option to pass your time. You aren&#8217;t missing out on anything by skipping it, but you won&#8217;t likely regret watching it if you tune in.</p>
<p>65. <strong>City of Ember</strong></p>
<p>I thought this film had plenty of potential based on the previews I saw for it, and while it wasn&#8217;t as entertaining as I had hoped, it was a really interesting film. There&#8217;s plenty of philosophical points of discussion to be had while weaving through the plot, and the characters were well developed. Don&#8217;t use Bill Murray as a reason to see this film, because he&#8217;s not a central focus of the movie nor is he a comedic element. See it if you like movies which pose questions of society and the government&#8217;s role therein. Skip it if you&#8217;re looking for an entertaining popcorn flick on a Friday evening.</p>
<p><strong>66. Never Let Me Go</strong></p>
<p>In learning that Andrew Garfield had been cast as the new Peter Parker in the upcoming Spider-Man reboot, I wanted to see more of his work. I spotted him as a talented actor in IMAGINARIUM OF DR PARNASSUS (despite not enjoying the film) and clearly he did well in The Social Network. When I saw the cast of Never Let Me Go also included Keira Knightley and one of my new favorite actresses, Carey Mulligan, I had to give it a watch. It&#8217;s certainly NOT a &#8220;feel good&#8221; story, but it&#8217;s certainly more interesting than you&#8217;ll give it credit for if you only watch the first half hour of the movie, once you start to get an idea for what the plot of the film is all about. Do yourself a favor if you decide to watch it, don&#8217;t look up any details about the film. Don&#8217;t read the back of the box. Just put it into your DVD player, hit play and enjoy the performances as the story unfolds.</p>
<p><strong>67. Bart Got A Room</strong></p>
<p>The previews for this movie make it look entertaining, but for the most part, it&#8217;s not. The lead character isn&#8217;t very sympathetic other than the fact that you&#8217;ll likely feel bad for the familial situation he&#8217;s in. Had the movie taken a different turn near the beginning of the film and his original choice to attend Prom with had agreed to the date, the movie could&#8217;ve been a lot better, even if the end result was exactly the same. Someone reading an early draft of the film should&#8217;ve given that suggestion, and had they been convincing, this movie might&#8217;ve actually made money instead of only collecting revenues to cover less than HALF of its paltry $2 million budget.</p>
<p><strong>68. Inglorious Basterds</strong></p>
<p>With Quinton Tarantino, you know you&#8217;re in for (at least) a very good film with no shortage of blood, so when I watched this movie, I wasn&#8217;t exactly surprised by anything, though I was a bit disappointed. The performances by Brad Pitt, Christoph Waltz, Diane Kruger, Daniel Bruhl and Melanie Laurent were all very, very good, to be certain.  My problem lies with the brutal nature of some of the scenes. The scalpings done by the Basterds definitely adds to their depth of character, and the brutality of the Bear Jew certainly gives you an idea for how devoted he was to the cause, but in both cases Quinton Tarantino makes the decision to get way too graphic with his depiction of their acts than need-be. Perhaps if this movie makes it to a basic cable channel I can DVR it and make sure it never gets deleted so I can watch it as often as I like, but the theatrical version which made it to DVD was simply too graphically violent for my taste.</p>
<p>69. <strong>Take Me Home Tonight</strong></p>
<p>I was a huge fan of the television series THAT 70&#8242;S SHOW, so when I saw Topher Grace was doing a movie set in the 1980&#8242;s and I heard it was written by people involved with the show, I was hooked. Anna Faris was as entertaining in the film as I knew she was going to be, the same can be said of Dan Fogler (who made BALLS OF FURY way more entertaining than it needed to be). I&#8217;m guessing that other guys who watch Take Me Home Tonight will enjoy Teresa Palmer, the main love interest, as much as I did. The only thing that took away from my enjoyment of this film was the sound editing. Demetri Martin, whose work I don&#8217;t always enjoy, had some great lines of dialogue in this film, and Chris Pratt portrayed Anna Faris&#8217; boyfriend really well, to the point where you don&#8217;t know whether you want to like him or hate him and you understand why Topher Grace (Faris&#8217; character&#8217;s twin brother) feels the same.  One scene would be quiet and I&#8217;d have to turn up the volume to hear the dialogue, and the next scene would have music turned up loud enough that I&#8217;d have to quickly reach for my remote to turn it way back down again, which affected the overall perceived quality of the film enough that my wife got annoyed and decided not to finish watching it because she found herself not connecting with the characters due to that annoyance which seemed to happen every three minutes. All in all, if the sound was edited right, I wouldn&#8217;t call it a classic, but it&#8217;s a movie I&#8217;d watch again and again.</p>
<h1>Potential Nominees From These Films</h1>
<p>Best Supporting Actress &#8211; Keira Knightley (Never Let Me Go)</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actress &#8211; Melanie Laurent (Inglorious Basterds)</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor &#8211; Christian Bale (The Fighter)</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor &#8211; Ed Harris (That&#8217;s What I Am)</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor &#8211; Alexander Walters (That&#8217;s What I Am)</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor &#8211; Jamie Foxx (The Soloist)</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor &#8211; Brad Pitt (Inglorious Basterds)</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor &#8211; Tommy Lee Jones (Captain America)</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor &#8211; Christoph Waltz (Inglorious Basterds)</p>
<p>Best Actress &#8211; Saoirse Ronan (City of Ember)</p>
<p>Best Actress &#8211; Carey Mulligan (Never Let Me Go)</p>
<p>Best Film &#8211; The Fighter</p>
<p>Best Film &#8211; Never Let Me Go</p>
<p>Best Film &#8211; Inglorious Basterds</p>
<h1>On Deck for September</h1>
<p>True Grit<br />
Hall Pass<br />
Precious<br />
Avatar<br />
The Girl Who Played with Fire (Swedish)</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guysnation.com%2Fdrive-66-month-7-july-2011&amp;title=Drive%20for%2066%3A%20Month%207%20%26%208%20%28July%20%26%20August%202011%29" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://www.guysnation.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guysnation.com/drive-66-month-7-july-2011/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
